🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.